.

Saturday, December 28, 2019

What Title Essay - 1307 Words

A Clockwork Orange : Chosen Evil vs. Forced Morality nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;What becomes of a man stripped of his free will? Does he continue to be a man, or does he cease? These are questions that Anthony Burgess tries to answer. Written in the middle of Burgess’ writing career, A Clockwork Orange was a reflection of a youth subculture of violence and terrorization that was beginning to emerge in the early 1960s. The novel follows Alex, a young hoodlum who is arrested for his violent acts towards the citizens of London. While incarcerated, Alex undergoes a technique in which his free will towards acts of a barbaric - or even harmless - nature is taken from him, then is forced to face the world once more as a machine-like†¦show more content†¦The inspiration of the scene between the writer, F. Alexander, and Alex and his â€Å"droogs,† or companions, was inspired by an actual event in Burgess’ past. In 1943, AWOL American soldiers attacked and raped Burgess’ pregnant wife, causing her to lose the child. Though his wife died two decades later, Burgess attributed her alcoholism and death on the incident (Galens). nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;The theme of free will is continuously woven through A Clockwork Orange, even by actions or words that seem simple. The repetition of Alex’s phrase, â€Å"What’s it going to be then, eh?† underscores the theme of individual choice (Galens). In the novel, Burgess asks readers what it means to be human. He implies that to fully understand humanity, an individual must accept their evil nature, and society’s attempt to stifle it (Galens). nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;â€Å"Alex chooses evil because it is in his nature to do so. His impulse towards good is artificial, because it comes from outside him, instilled by a government bent on controlling the populace by controlling their desires.† (Galens.) Burgess believed that although people are wicked from birth, they are also born with the ability to choose for themselves. This ability is the one that makes human beings just that - human (Galens). While in prison, Alex is not rehabilitated; he is reshaped and brainwashed by the Minister of the Interior into an individual with no freedom of choice. nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;nbsp;In A ClockworkShow MoreRelatedWhat Is The Importance Of The Title896 Words   |  4 PagesThe title is extremely important it must be chosen with great care referring to the core contents of the paper. It will be read by thousands, where few will read the whole paper. An improperly titled paper will get lost and will never be read because if the title of the paper is improper the reader will think the information is as well. The title should also be informative but not to long something that will catch the readers attention. Dont forget to include the authors and institutional contactRead MoreUse Of Linkedin Authority For Career Branding Purposes855 Words   |  4 Pagessame) because you need to show people what you stand for, but you also need to highlight something specifically terrific about yourself. Tip - Think of yourself as selling a service instead of selling a product. The service is your time and expertise. Creating a brand-friendly title Your title needs to in some way reflect your brand focus. It doesn’t have to state it overtly, and it may look at little tacky if you do, but it should give readers a hint around what to expect. The biggest mistake thatRead MoreCover Letter Example1069 Words   |  5 PagesDate 1Name of Employer Official Title Business Name Street Address City, ST zip 1Dear Mr., Ms., Mrs.: 2â€Å"Enclosed please find my application materials for the position of Office Clerk, as advertised in the Chico Enterprise Record.† Or: â€Å"I am pleased to apply for the position of Office Clerk, as advertised in the Chico Enterprise Record. Enclosed are my resume and letters of recommendation for your consideration.† 3â€Å"I have five years of office experience, and most of my experienceRead MoreWhat Do I Title This With?1757 Words   |  8 PagesTiffany Dagus HRE4M1 Mr. Dispasquale January 09, 2015 WHAT DO I TITLE THIS WITH In today’s current events the names Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown have become very familiar, unfortunately in a rather negative way. Both men happened to be African-Americans who were shot and killed by policemen identified as being Caucasian men which raised the concern whether if both cases were examples of racial profiling. Racial profiling is the use of an individual’s race or ethnicity as a main factor in decidingRead MoreBlack Hat Or Devil s Advocate Process2398 Words   |  10 Pagesis caused when a title is held and not sent to the payoff dealer in a timely manner is to create a dealer notification process. This process will consist of contacting the dealer by phone, email or fax to notify them of the accounts that have a title on hold for missing odometer statement. The solution should be implemented because it is quick to implement, will have a low cost to implement and will have a big impact on the issue. If the dealers are notified as soon as the titl e is placed on holdRead MoreSchemas: Experiment and Title Type3152 Words   |  13 Pagesstudents. We gave them different titles and read them a passage with the intentions of finding out how many ideas they were able to recall. Since our first experiment found no significant difference, we conducted a second experiment except this time we gave the title either before or after the passage was read. We found no significant difference between the title types, but we did find a significant difference between before and after. We also found a significant title type x presentation interactionRead MoreAdverse Possession Is A Method3698 Words   |  15 PagesAdverse possession is a method by which a trespasser gains legal title to a property by occupying it for some time period. This kind of ownership may not be necessarily intentional, it can occur as a mistake where a deed may be faulty. Both personal and real property can be acquired by adverse possession. However, ownership of proper ty for public use for instance school property or a highway cannot be lost through adverse possession. The history of adverse possession can be traced back to the 12thRead MoreAdverse Possession Is A Method By Student s Name3855 Words   |  16 Pages ADVERSE POSSESSION By Student’s Name Code + Course Name Institution of Learning City, State Date ADVERSE POSSESSION Adverse possession is a method by which a trespasser gains legal title to a property by occupying it for some period. This kind of ownership may not be necessarily intentional, it can occur as a mistake where a deed may be faulty. Both personal and real property can be acquired by adverse possession. However, ownership of property for public use for instance school propertyRead MoreAnalysis Of William Shakespeare s Romeo And Juliet2054 Words   |  9 Pagesdifferent titles that can be used to address women as opposed to men, but despite the title used, the woman herself does not change. Only the meaning and stereotype associated with the title used changes. Throughout the years, the titles used to address women have slowly shifted meaning from that of a social status to that of a marital status. Erickson (2014) explains that the titles â€Å"Miss† and â€Å"Mrs.† are the oldest coined terms used to address women, and both of them derive from the title â€Å"MistressRead MoreWhat Is Her Job Title, And Job Description?1279 Words   |  6 PagesWhat is her job title, and job description? Job title is a clinical social worker on the orthopedic floor. She assists patients with discharge. She assists patients and families with discharge, she speaks with families regarding discharges to skilled nursing facilities. Sending referrals to facilities that patients are interested in. Describe the agency/organization with whom you work for. What type of agency is it? What is the mission statement? She works for Roanoke Memorial. She isn’t sure of

Friday, December 20, 2019

Death Finality or Everlasting Life Essay - 625 Words

The loss of a loved one is an emotional and personal experience, and everyone grieves in their own way. Before the healing process can begin, the deceased must be laid to rest and this is usually accomplished with a funeral service. Many people choose a piece to be read at these ceremonies, such as W.H. Auden’s â€Å"Funeral Blues† and Mary Elizabeth Frye’s â€Å"Do Not Stand at My Grave and Weep.† It is quite thought-provoking to compare the poems, since the subject matter is the same, however each of these works views death from a different perspective, one negative and the other positive. Auden’s â€Å"Funeral Blues† is perceived through the eyes of the mourner. The tone is sad and the state of mind of the speaker is full of melancholy.†¦show more content†¦His entire world has been altered and the consequence is that â€Å"nothing now can ever come to any good.† It sounds as if the speaker wants to give up on life and has no hope of ever being able to love again. In contrast, Mary Elizabeth Frye’s â€Å"Do Not Stand at My Grave and Weep† is seen through the eyes of the deceased unlike â€Å"Funeral Blues† which is seen through the eyes of the mourner. The tone of this poem is uplifting and gives the reader a sense of peace. Similar to â€Å"Funeral Blues,† the main theme is about death and its secondary theme is about love. Frye uses metaphors and symbolism to explain that death does not have to be final, and wants the reader to believe that the speaker did not die, but that she is present in all the beautiful things in nature. The speaker shows love for the survivors and wants to give them comfort by telling them â€Å"do not stand at my grave and weep† but to go out and enjoy life. She is telling her loved ones that her body is no longer on earth but her spirit is very much â€Å"alive† and that her memory will always be with them in their thoughts. The subject of both poems deals with the passing of a loved one, and each one’s view of death is compelling, however the impact of each poem depends on the frame of mind of the bereaved. There is a distinct difference between both works. â€Å"Funeral Blues† is depressing andShow MoreRelatedHamlets Second Soliloquy Essay927 Words   |  4 Pagescomments on ‘the Everlasting’ fixing his ‘canon ‘gainst self-slaughter’ in his first soliloquy, where he also condemns his flesh as ‘too too solid’, the same ‘sinews’ that he now calls upon to ‘bear [him] stiffly up’. One of the Ghosts most poignant effects on Hamlet is pointed out by L.C. Knights in Hamlet and Death, where he explains that â€Å"Hamlet’s exclusive concentration upon things rank and gross and his consequent recoil from life as a whole determine his attitude to death, which also is purelyRead More Buddism Essay969 Words   |  4 Pagesexistence in man of an immortal soul. The Enlightenment which dwells in life does not belong to one form of life. All that is mans changing and mortal; the Immortal is not any mans. The Buddha pointed out how no thing is the same at this moment as it was a moment ago. Even the everlasting hills are slowly being worn away, and every particle of the human body, even the hardest, is replaced every seven years. There is no finality or rest within this universe, only a ceaseless becoming and a never-endingRead MoreSonnet 73 Analysis Essay486 Words   |  2 PagesSonnet 73, the speaker uses a series of metaphors to characterize what he perceives to be the nature of his old age. This poem is not simply a procession of interchangeable metaphors; it is the story of the speaker slowly coming to grips with the finality of his age and his impermanence in time. In the first quatrain, the speaker contrasts his age is like a time of year,: late autumn, when the yellow leaves have almost completely fallen from the trees and the boughs shake against the coldRead MoreHamlet, By William Shakespeare1470 Words   |  6 Pagesnotion of mortality and suicide. Shakespeare proficiently juxtaposes this against the idea of life to highlight hamlet’s conflicted emotions. â€Å"Too too solid flesh would melt†¦ ‘Gainst self-slaughter. O God, God,† proficiently identifies Hamlet as living in a painful world, yet death would sentence him to eternal suffering in hell, due to the societal beliefs of Christianity. The painful nature of his life is evident through the effective use of emotive language, indicating that hamlet may suffer aRead MoreThe Golden Age Of Greece Essay1603 Words   |  7 Pages ‘I entreat you, by your life, by your knees, by your parents, do not let the dogs feed on me by the ships of the Achaians†¦ give my body to be taken home again, so that the Trojans and the wives of the Trojans may give me in death my rite of burning’ (22.338-343). This heart wrenching plea represents nearly the final words uttered by Hektor upon his death at the hands of Achilles. Hektor, who recently boasted of his martial prowess, vowing just moments before to do ‘some big thing first, thatRead MoreThe Epic Of Gilgamesh And Odysseus1497 Words   |  6 Pagescapable of dying, although they choose to act upon an overestimated mindset. The two journeys began similarly. Gilgamesh began his journey suffering from the loss of Enkidu and searching for immortality. He had the false assumption that he could avoid death because he was two-thirds god and one-third man. The people described him as â€Å"a star from heaven† (The Epic of Gilgamesh 63 Trans. N.K. Sandars). This mindset led him to his eventual downfall. Odysseus’ hubris is displayed when he overestimates hisRead MoreThe Inspirations from the Mayan Ballgame1515 Words   |  7 PagesPopol Vuh, the collection of stories describing Mayan mythistory, contains the origin of the ballgame, and in this story is embedded the framework of proper Mayan values and behavior. It is what Freidel, Schele, and Parker call â€Å"a charter for a way of life.† According to the Popol Vuh, the Hero Twins named Hunahpu and Xblalanque cross over into the Underworld, Xibalba. There they play the Lords of the domain in a series of ballgames risking their lives as they are also tested in various trials, hopingRead MoreDeath Is Not The End1762 Words   |  8 Pageshistory, people have refused to accept the finality that death brings to life. Death brings an unacceptable, sudden interruption to one’s work, plans, and relationships. Though the inscription on many tombstones often reads, Rest in Peace, the truth of the matter is that mos t people do not welcome the peaceful rest of the grave. They would rather be alive and productive† (Samuele Bacchiocchi). As a Christian it is important as a Christian to understnd that death Is not the end. If we live our lives accordingRead MoreEssay A Mortals Sense Of Immortality1802 Words   |  8 Pages A Mortalamp;#8217;s Sense of Immortality To fear death is to fear life itself. An overbearing concern for the end of life not only leads to much apprehension of the final moment but also allows that fear to occupy oneamp;#8217;s whole life. The only answer that can possibly provide relief in the shadow of the awaited final absolution lies in another kind of absolution, one that brings a person to terms with their irrevocable mortality and squelches any futile desire for immortality. Myths areRead MorePoetic Perceptions of Death Essay3253 Words   |  14 Pagesideas on death. Death is a common theme in any eras but it took a particular significance in the 19th century , especially in literature. As intense poets, both Dickinson and Tennyson shared their innermost views regarding death, particularly seen in Tennyson’s â€Å"Mariana†, â€Å"Crossing the Bar† and Dickinson’s â€Å"Because I could not stop for death† and â€Å"Behind me—dips Eternity.† In â€Å"Because I could not stop for death† and â€Å"Behind me—dips Eternity†, Dickinson challenges our perception of death. The depiction

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Neutrality Acts of 1937 free essay sample

The Neutrality Acts of the United States of America has been ever changing for centuries. The policies of the neutrality acts from 1794 and 1937 have needed amendments and additives over time to adjust to our ever changing world in regards to political and economical circumstances. In addition, sentiment among American academics and the voice of the common citizen have played intricate roles in forging through the amendments in the acts of neutrality. It is also important to discuss the journalism being written and editorial opinions during the time in which the act is being enforced and revised. In 1794 the United States of America was in the infancy stages of beginning a sovereign nation and debated over the application of foreign policy with European nations. President George Washington wanted to remain neutral in foreign circumstances, but still have the opportunity to trade commercially with European nations. The French Revolutionary war promoted the United States to put themselves in a neutral position in regards to European conflicts. President George Washington’s Cabinet signed a set of rules regarding policies of neutrality on August 3, 1793, and these rules were formalized when Congress passed a neutrality bill on June 4, 1794. In the face of fearing a future conflict with European nations, President George Washington proclaimed the treaty in the face of popular disapproval, realizing that it was the price of peace with Great Britain and that it gave the United States valuable time to rearrange and rearm in the event of future conflict. Washington proclaims, [1]If any person shall within the territory or jurisdiction of the United States begin or set on foot or provide or prepare the means for any military expedition or enterprise against the territory or dominions of any foreign prince or state of whom the United States was at peace that person would be guilty of misdemeanor. This legislation formed the basis for neutrality policy throughout the nineteenth century. One reason for the act was to create a liability for violation of Section 8 of Article One of the United States Constitution, which reserves to the United States Congress the power to decide to go to war. The act was amended several times and remains in force. As the United States moves into the twentieth century, President Franklin D. Roosevelt is continuingly making decisions in foreign policy. In particular the neutrality act of 1937, this states. The Congress is properly urged to declare as a permanent American policy and as a gratuitous contribution to world peace that it will not permit the shipment of arms, munitions and implements of war to belligerent nations, thereby refusing to permit the United States to become the symbol of arms and ammunitions for the sake of war profits, or the political slaughterhouse of the world. America stands alone among the great nations of the earth in proclaiming this new doctrine as a permanent policy to a war weary world. Many in congress felt that the neutrality act of 1937 was cutting American exports off at the knees for example, [3]The President shall by proclamation from time to time definitely the articles and materials which it shall be unlawful for American vessels to transport, is an unjustifiable delegation of the embargo powers of congress, a gross discrimination against American Ships and a pusillanimous act unworthy of a great Nation. President Franklin D. Roosevelt had tough adjustments to acts of neutrality that had been in place for almost two hundred years. The Neutrality Act of 1937 made the act of 1936 permanent and included the basic provisions and of its predecessors. The provisions are as stated, [4]The Congress by concurrent resolution, shall find that there exists a state of war between foreign states, and that it is necessary to promote the security or preserve the peace of the United States or to protect the lives of citizens of the United States, the President shall issue a proclamation hereafter be unlawful for any American vessel to carry any passengers or any article or materials to any state named in such proclamation and] it shall be unlawful for any person to export, or attempt to export, from the United States to any other state, any arms, ammunition, or implements of war. Between 1935 and 1939 Congress passed four neutrality acts to limit Americas involvement in foreign conflicts. The political debate surrounding the neutrality acts reflected the evolving view of Americas role in the world. Public opinion was shifting away from isolationism toward interventionism and collective security and the belief that Americas best defense lay in cooperative efforts with other nations and international organizations. The academic critique of scholars is discussed in the Washington Post. Dr. Raymond Leslie Buell shows how sacrifice and democracy is being played out in the act itself. [5]It is depressing to see well-intended Americans in their desire to keep this country out of war, contend that the United States is justified in injuring China through its neutrality act. Should American Liberalism take the attitude that the end justifies the means, or should it lose its sense of justice and its capacity for sacrifice, then the future of democracy in this country is indeed dark. Every American desires to keep out of war, but means to be found to achieve this end which do not violate fundamental American conceptions of justice to weaker peoples and which do not approve, even by implication, the act of wanton terrorism which Japan is committing in China today. The acts also signify a power shift from the legislative to the executive branch in international affairs. Whereas Congress previously controlled the details of foreign policy programs, the acts increasingly granted the presidency and executive agencies leeway to implement new laws. For example, 6]Any proclamation issued by the President under this section shall apply equally to all belligerents. You will see that this is what is ordinarily called the cash-and-carry system. Your committee has felt, however, that neither subsection (a) nor (b) should be in effect by the President unless under such conditions as he feels that is necessary to maintain our neutrality or to protect the lives or commerce of our nationals. Roosevelt declared the United States neutral and invoked the act to place a blanket ban on all weapons shipments to all countries and to prohibit Americans from traveling on ships registered in any warring nation. The urgency of the act needing to pass immediately and its details are depicted in newspapers all across the country. The Chicago Tribune discusses, [7]the state department tonight announced that President Roosevelt on a fishing cruise off the coast of Texas has signed the neutrality act and has proclaimed a list of articles which is prohibited to export to belligerent and manufactures of which require to regulate and obtain licenses. This proclamation super cedes a similar issued on April 10, 1936 and has seven categories of enumerates war articles including arms of any kind, ammunition, explosives, warships, submarines, air crafts, poisonous gases, flame throwers, etc. The policy of American neutrality in 1937 included travel for American citizens during war time. The government instructed that no citizen of the United States should be traveling on any vessels bond for a warring foreign nation. The congressional record states, 8]after such proclamation is issued by the President, and he shall find that the maintenance of peace between the United States and foreign states, or the protection of the lives of citizens of the United States or the security of the United States requires that American citizens should refrain from traveling on the vessels of the state or states named in the said proclamation, and thereafter it shall be unlawful for any citizen of the United States to travel on any such vessels named in the proclamation and any citizen that does so travel on vessels does so at their own risk. Another section within the Neutrality Act of 1937 consisted of specific financial transactions in regards to foreign nations. The Act of 1937 states, [9]In order to maintain our neutrality it is very necessary to keep our citizens as neutral as possible. Of course, this amendment does not undertake to prohibit any donations made by any citizens; neither will it interfere with any collections made from the Red Cross. Your committee considers this section, which we are reenacting, a very important section because it deals with credits and the purchase and sale, and exchange, of bonds and securities, and so forth. We feel that under this section no foreign wars can be financed in this country. The State Department drafted broader neutrality legislation to address this imbalance, giving the president authority to implement embargoes selectively. Such authority would better reflect the administrations position toward warring countries. However, congressional isolationists rejected the measure as giving the president too much control over American trade. The Los Angeles Times reports, 10]The new act, however, it is said, contains more extensive prohibitions since the President, announced simultaneously that American vessels engaged in commerce with Spain may carry small arms and ammunition necessary for preservation of discipline aboard. The act barred transportation of all arms. Under the new law the President may designate materials or commodities not to be transported to belligerents by American merchant vessel. Americans who sell such goods will be required to relinquish title before shipment. In the Neutrality Act of 1936, Congress simply extended the 1935 act by fourteen months and added a provision to rohibit private loans to belligerents. There was a continuity of change with the Neutrality Act of 1937 made the 1936 act permanent and included the basic provisions of its predecessors. [11]Whenever the President, or the Congress by concurrent resolution, shall find that there exists a state of war between foreign states, and that it is necessary to promote the security or preserve the peace of the United States or to protect the lives of citizens of the United States, the President shall issue a proclamation naming the states involved. President Franklin D. Roosevelt asks Congress to repeal neutrality legislation, September 26, 1939. thereafter be unlawful for any American vessel to carry any passengers or any article or materials to any state named in such proclamation [and] it shall be unlawful for any person to export, or attempt to export, from the United States to any other state, any arms, ammunition, or implements of war. But the 1937 act also added a two-year cash-and-carry provision permitting Americans to trade with belligerents who paid cash and transported the goods on non-U.S. vessels following a declaration of neutrality. It shall thereafter be unlawful to export or transport, or attempt to export or transport, or cause to be exported or transported, from the United States to any state named in such proclamation, any articles or materials (except copyrighted articles or materials) until all right, title, and interest therein shall have been transferred to some foreign government, agency, institution, association, partnership, corporation, or national. Cash-and-carry gave the president the authority he had sought in 1935 to declare limited rather than blanket embargoes. The plan permitted the president to tailor the U. S. approach to the circumstances of unique conflicts and perhaps better reflect Americas interests. However, critics noted that cash-and-carry would unequally benefit nations like Japan, England, and France, capable of paying cash and protecting their ships with strong navies. In the next few months to come there is a shift away from being neutral towards war with belligerent nations. Dr.Buell continues to warn about the dangers of the policy in regards to trade. This policy, however, involves the daily danger of a clash with Japan but in its present limited form has no effect in shortening the duration of the war. In failing to think in co-operative terms, the present policy of the State Department in the Far East involves all the risks of international sanctions without any its advantages. In response to the Sino-Japanese War of August 1937, Roosevelt avoided the issue of cash-and-carry altogether by not invoking the Neutrality Act.

Wednesday, December 4, 2019

The Tall Man Passage Analysis free essay sample

The Tall Man’ published in 2008 tells the story of the 2004 Palm Island death in custody. She follows the lives of the families involved and the events that took place after the death. I will focus on a passage from the text on pages 182-185. This passage is about the inquest into Cameron Doomadgee’s death. A large proportion of the passage is spoken in the first person but also reverts to the third person at the end of the passage. Speaking in the first person is Tracy Twaddle, the now widowed wife of Cameron Doomadgee. In this part of the text Hooper has used a transcript from the inquest to show how Cameron Doomadgee’s wife’s presentation to the court resonates there is love and peace within the Palm Island community and is the depiction of who Cameron Doomadgee was but at the same time portrays the existence of goodness among the people on the island. Here the reader is presented with the first insight into Cameron Doomadgee’s life and at the same time offers an introduction and understanding into the contradictions that exist within life on Palm Island Throughout the book Chloe Hooper speaks to Cameron Doomadgee’s family but she never asks them anything personal about Cameron himself. This passage is the first time intimate details about Cameron are revealed and it seems strategic the author leaves this to the person who knows him most intimately – his wife. Tracy Twaddle’s speech at the inquest is a main feature of the passage. The passion and vulnerabilities are clear of a life so tragically lost that did not need to be lost so tragically and needlessly. It also offers insight that this death was not accidental. Chloe Hooper’s introduction of Tracy Twaddle to the reader immediately moves the reader’s emotional senses that here is a grieving wife. The previous year Tracy had ‘gone to hospital with pneumonia after sleeping a night on Cameron’s grave. ’ Throughout the book the reader only sees the abuse of women on Palm Island and nothing is devoted to understanding if love exists between couples on the island. For the first time the reader is introduced to the love a woman has for her husband and displayed through the grief she feels for his death. There is a strong use of imagery in the first paragraph which is used to show Tracy Twaddle’s anguish over losing her husband. Chloe Hooper makes an effort to make the reader feel sympathy for Tracy by describing in detail the way Tracy looks to her stating, â€Å"her large body was hunched in old clothes – widow’s black  with a print of white flowers. † In your mind you have this picture of her being hunched, in ragged old clothing and clearly distressed by the situation she is now in – that of a grieving widow who has lost the man she dearly loved. The reader is immediately moved to feel the same sorrow towards Tracy she is feeling over the loss of her husband. Tracy is very polite in the courtroom and asks the judge ‘can I sit down? ’ when previously in the book she had seemed much stronger, defending her Aboriginal rights and also Cameron. Here before the courtroom, the reader is faced with a broken woman – a woman whose heart has been broken and the vulnerability and fragility of her life are put in the spotlight. This is a stark contrast to the portrayal of Aboriginals being drunken troublemakers who are violent in the community but now Chloe Hooper shows the reader a person who has faced the same emotions as many white human beings before her. Here is the kind, loving side that is often hidden behind the wrong-doings of other people in the community. This is where stereotyping comes into play which often gives us the wrong impression of people. Where the negative actions of some form the view of the majority. In this passage we uncover Tracy Twaddle’s hidden personality and made aware of her human frailties which are the same as those of any race and culture– these are the emotions of every human being faced with the same situation. The transcript of Tracy Twaddle’s speech at the inquest is incredibly moving and surprised me. Never in the book do we hear of such love between a husband and wife within this community. We only ever hear of the abuse and the hurt that takes place on Palm Island. Tracy often repeats the phrase â€Å"simple but happy† to describe not only Cameron himself but also his life. Tracy Twaddle speaks fondly of Cameron but also speaks the honest truth. Cameron Doomadgee is described by Tracy Twaddle as being caring, kind, joking, ready for a laugh, an inspiration, a proud father and a real and genuine person. Although this seems hard to believe after everything we already know about Cameron, we have now learned more about the true Cameron. Many may think it is just a way to cover up all Cameron Doomadgee’s wrong doings but it is clearly evident that Tracy speaks from the heart in this speech and every word she says comes from the heart. Hooper supports Tracy Twaddle’s speech by adding: â€Å"Everyone on the island described Cameron as a happy-go-lucky, as the last person to look for a fight†. Here we are faced with two personalities and it is up to the reader to choose which side of Cameron they believe is the real Cameron. In this passage there are many contradictions explored. We are shown a side of Cameron Doomadgee that is a complete opposite to how he has been portrayed previously. Tracy Twaddle speaks fondly of Cameron Doomadgee emphasising the good in him but also not forgetting that he was not a perfect man. First we hear that Cameron Doomadgee is this lovely man who cared for his family and friends and tried his hardest to support his family which is all probably true but then we are reminded that he drank methylated spirits, that he had been admitted to hospital with knife wounds and alcoholic seizures. We are torn between these two different personalities and are unsure which one to believe. The two personalities of Cameron Doomadgee represent each side of the court case. The loving, caring side of Cameron Doomadgee represents how the Palm Island community see Cameron and is also telling the reader that family, relationships and love are just as strong here as they are in all communities. However, at the same time the reference to this being an Aboriginal person reflects the community bias viewing black as being subclass and without feeling and emotion. Aboriginals are stereotyped as being drunk, drug users and rowdy people. The Cameron Doomadgee that drank methylated spirits and was admitted to hospital several times represents the tragic situation of a marginalised people by the majority who don’t see past what has caused these people to lose their identity and place within communities and therefore with all sense of loss of esteem comes the viral spread of disorder as we see on Palm Island and the strong police brutality to control it. The last part of the passage speaks about the Palm Island community but also Aboriginal communities around Australia. In these last paragraphs Chloe Hooper is trying to show how the Aboriginal communities feel about the scrutiny they are put under by the white community. Hooper also makes a link between the different perspectives of Cameron Doomadgee to the different perspectives of Palm Island. Hooper says that Tracy Twaddle had â€Å"delivered a eulogy, and eulogies smooth away sharp edges – but this also seemed to be a question of perspective, or of degree. † This relates to Hooper also saying â€Å"From the outside, Palm Island often doesn’t make sense. From the inside, perhaps it does. † This is also a difference in perspective; to the Palm Islanders their island makes perfect sense and their way of life seems completely normal and fine to them but to outsiders it seems violent, scary and tough. This could be attributed to the fact that the stories that emerge from Palm Island are always those filled with loss, despair and tragic endings of a marginalised people. Here there is a link between how society view native Aboriginals and how they view the Palm Island community. Primary sources are used to give an outsiders understanding of the Palm Island community and what outsiders think of Aboriginals and their way of living. Hooper incorporates allusions to Aboriginal Dreamtime stories to show the Aboriginal people’s connection with the land and the issues happening around them. These Dreamtime stories are also something that is only understood by the Aboriginals and is personal to them. They accept the hardships they experience but embrace them and try to find joy in the things they do. Primary sources are used to give an outsiders understanding of the Palm Island community and what outsiders think of Aboriginals and their way of living. Hooper explains this further through her line from W. E. H Stanner describing the Aboriginal view of life as â€Å"a joyous thing with maggots at the centre† and then Hooper backs up the ‘joyous’ part of this statement with the line â€Å"there is the ongoing human attempt to find joy. † Here she has shown that there is joy and love on Palm Island, you just need the right perspective to see it. The title of Chloe Hooper’s The Tall Man, already states the theme of contradiction that becomes evident in this book. Contradiction is what defines the perspectives in this book. The Tall Man is the story of a vicious and powerful being that has ruined the lives of a community, now marginalised and on the fridges of society. It clearly depicts that when you peel away the surface and the crust that has allowed to build in this community, despite how pot-marked and ugly it might appear on the surface, the fruit inside is still wholesome and full of goodness. Cameron Doomadgee was a good man to his wife and people knew him this way, but to the outside world he was a victim of the stereotypical attitude towards Aboriginal people and his death and subsequent understanding of him was a result of this racism and lack of understanding of a people who do have a good inner core but have become a victim of the society they have been forced to adapt to.