'The Good, the Bad, and ‘the Daily Show’ Reading Analysis\r'

' summary of The Good, The Bad, and The Daily gentlemaneuver In Jason Zinser’s â€Å"The Good, the Bad, and The Daily exhibition” his purpose was to phrase a response to the uncertainty regarding the genuineness and ethics of ‘ fictitious’ word of honor sources. Zinser begins by discussing if it is acceptable to obtain information from a humorous and often satiric give-and-take source (in this example, The Daily Show), he points aside that â€Å"the question isn’t whether Jon Stewart or the head’s producers and writers are morally fog people, but whether or not hedge news is, on the whole, beneficial or damaging to society” (Zinser 363-364).In other(a) words, he begs the question, lavatory we really be an apprised public that can contribute, comprehend, and function as a democracy through the projections of a ‘fake’ news source? Zinser so makes the claim that ‘fake’ news causes deuce vices , the first being deception callable to the lack of valuing objectivity in their reports. The assist is dilution, both in the quality of media from the dissonance of online sources as well as adding riotous news reports attracting more viewing audience to what is typically a hard news source.Zinser in any case reminds us of the beneficial aspects in ‘fake’ news. Empirical data suggests a swerve that either viewers of The Daily Show are better informed than those reflection hard news because of its effectiveness, or, on the other hand that it attracts viewers who already adhere it on ab forth the current events being discussed, yard of its success.The ideal solution, he concludes, would be to connect the deuce, retaining the power and persuasion of The Daily Show as well as including â€Å" abstruseness and insight” more apparent in hard news reports, helping viewers understand divers(prenominal) sides of the arguments present (Zinser 371). Wh en fall into Zinser’s writing, whatever similar aspects from George Orwell’s, politics in the incline Language came to mind. Orwell states, â€Å" insane thoughts, being a result of dustup, language has become a result of cockamamie thoughts.Vagueness is the most evident characteristic of the English prose. There is a lack of imagery and the figurative language no nightlong gives a connection to images and concrete thoughts. ” When comparison this to the satirical writing and language that Zinser speaks of in The Good, The Bad, and ‘The Daily Show’ it creates a perfect(a) picture of how by exemplifying the two vices, (deception and dilution) misconceptions can easily happen, especially when your single news source is a satirical ‘fake’ ews source. When thinking about some of the other ‘fake’ news sources, wiz example that might be miss is The Onion: a very common source from which the stories are based on circ umstance but written in a humorous and satirical way. be that The Onion makes fun of all different types of news events from health issues to sports, The Onion rattling delves into multiple aspects of our culture in a comical way but liquid delivering facts and informing people about what is liberation on in the world.In this case it can be just as potent as real news. In fact an example of The Onions influential satirical news was captured when they create the world’s sexiest man and posted Kim Jong Un (the North Korean Dictator) as the sexiest man alive. North Korea took it serious and published it in their local paper and make a big deal out of it (news. yahoo. com). It is in this same sense that is draw in Zinser’s analysis of this so called ‘fake’ news that you can get an idea of the actual influence this has on our culture.\r\n'