Affirmative Action and Higher Education Essay -- Critical Thinking Essa

Affirmative Action and Higher Education Two tidy sum stand in a room looking at a vibrant painting and receive a tot everyy different image. This is something we all realize can happen. It is our different perspectives that make us valuable similarly each other. When trying to solve a problem or pretend a new idea, we need each other to bring frontward considerations and concepts that would never occur otherwise. This concept is something most of us grasp in theory, yet it never ceases to confound and confuse us if someone draws a conclusion tangent from ours when presented with the same information. This situation lies at the heart of the lean over affirmative action. Policies that are viewed by some as righting old wrongs are viewed by others as creating a level playing sports stadium or even instigating a new phase of unjust discrimination. distinguish of this confusion is because the range of views not only shifts between people, but too over time. Policies that once ap peared to be necessary can, in a hardly a(prenominal) decades, seem excessive. When Justice Powell, along with the rest of the United States Supreme Court, give down the decision in Regents of University of California v. Bakke in 1978, he essay to give a rational for affirmative action in higher(prenominal) education that did not rely on retribution for one lavation however, over time modest progress improving minority delegacy in schools have combined with the frustrations of a new generation to have a present situation that puts the pasts policies under new political and heavy scrutiny. When the Bakke decision was handed down it set standards for what affirmative action programs should be like. Specifically, it referred to the Harvard process (Schauer 592), but abstractly it was more gener... ...ronicle. November 5, 1998. http//www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/ account/1998/11/05/MN16107.DTL. National Center for policy Analysis. Racial Preferences Dont Help Students Graduate. thought process House. June 11, 1997. http//www.ncpa.org/pd/affirm/pdaa/pdaa12.html. Regents of the University of California. Text of Resolutions SP-1 and SP-2. Representations Online. Summer 1996. http//violet.berkeley.edu7000/R55/regents.html. Schauer, Frederick and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. The Philosophy of Law. Harcourt Brace College Publishers Austin. 1996. Sparks. order Judge. Hopwood v. The State of Texas. August 19, 1994. http//tarlton.law.utexas.edu/hopwood/hoptxt.htm. Sowell, Thomas. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research. Body Count versus Education. AEI On the Issues. August 1997. http//www.aei.org/oti/oti7919.htm.