Sophistic Movement :: essays research papers

The vast majority of todays society isnt the slightest check aware of the tremendous influence the sophistic period of thought has had and continues to stick on modern western politics. But how could a supposedly exceedingly educated and intelligent people be so ignorant of much(prenominal) an important and significant epoch in our history? It was during the fifth nose candy B.C. when the sophistic movement, founded by a bit named Protagoras, was at its prime. The sophist were know as highly skillful teachers by many and their works on issues such as the efficiency of language and the existence of gods were considered to be revolutionary at the time. Not every one was in aggreance with these new philosophies and non long after the movement began, the sophist and their works were being harshly persecuted. Many of them were exhiled and their works were all but completely annihilated. Now, very trivial is left of the sophists, except for what other prominent theorists rece ive said virtually them. At the head of this condescending army was Plato, whose own theories opposed those of the sophists in numerable . Anyone who has read some of Platos writing can tell you that what he had to say about Protagoras, Gorgias, Prodicus and the other sophists was by no means benevolent, and gibe to G.B. Kerferd, nor was it a completely factual description of them. Unfortunately, since these innacurate depictions are all we have left, the generations that were to come accepted Platos hostile opinion of the sophists and it is for this reason that the word sophist is now found to be synonomous with the words bigot and know-it-all. Modern scholars have latterly been trying to dispell the myths about the sophists, which is exactly what G.B. Kerferd attempts to do in his book The sophistic Movement. According to Kerferd, at the foundation of sophistic though is the statement, made by its founder Protagoras, that Man is the measure of all things. Man considers things to be as they pop to him. To explain this phenomenon, Kerferd makes an example out of the point. If one man says that the wind is cold, and the man standing beside him finds it to be warm, even if they were both being affected by the same wind, both statements would be considered correct. Since man (the individual) is the measure of all things, the wind is cold to the man to whom it appears cold and warm to the man to whom it appears warm.